sf> Sure, and as I said I'm not opposed to that. I suspect the sf> best thing is for the authors to chat with our AD and see sf> if he's either willing to AD-sponsor it, or to ask another sf> WG to adopt, or try find a dispatch-like process to see if sf> enough interest/review can be found that way.
It's the WG's document, and the WG can abandon it if it likes. That would require some consensus seeking discussing. If it turns out the WG isn't interested in the document, I sure wish that the WG had said so a year ago though. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet