Arthur Clune wrote: > > On 21 Jun 2007, at 09:57, David Watson wrote: > >> >> How about setting out the current plan for Honeywall development now >> that v1.2 has gone public > > David has just beat me to it. Another thing it would be good to know is > what you think might need doing to move to CentOS. That might be a good > thing for people to get involved in?
One question to resolve should probably be 'does the honeywall need to be a full platform or can it just be a bundle of related applications you drop on a platform of your choice'. This seems to come up often enough to merit some consideration. Probably jumping the gun slightly here, but IMHO a general strengths and weaknesses review of all our current honeynet technology would be worthwhile, to ensure that we are working on the most important challenges and delivering what most needs doing, rather than just ploughing on with a previous path. Thanks, David -- David Watson UK Honeynet Project www.ukhoneynet.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Honeywall mailing list [email protected] https://public.honeynet.org/mailman/listinfo/honeywall
