Good points. Given that we've seen people on the list having to go out people on the list having to go outand buy network cards that work with CentOS 5 though, I think the effort required to get it to 5.5 is worth it. After that, we should probably start again based on a more modern way of building the iso.And re-jigging the docs to give more information about qebek rather than sebek (https://projects.honeynet.org/sebek/wiki/Qebek) etc.
Basically I agree with you Earl: the current roo is a pile of fixes atop fixes atop fixes and it should probably be done afresh. That will take a while though. Arthur On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Earl Sammons <earl.samm...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, if I (or anyone else for that matter) have limited cycles to > contribute at this point in time, are they better spent fixing what we > have today or planning for what we all want 'tomorrow' ? -- Arthur Clune art...@clune.org _______________________________________________ Honeywall mailing list Honeywall@public.honeynet.org https://public.honeynet.org/mailman/listinfo/honeywall
