-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: [Hornlist] Who'd a thunk it?
Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:20:59 -0700
From:   Richard V. West <[email protected]>
To:     The Horn List <[email protected]>



Bill:

Did you "thunk" your computer? Maybe its CPU is dead and needs to be replaced 
by a new brass one.

Richard in Seattle
Where the paint never dries

On 4/20/2011 4:42 PM, William Gross wrote:
>  Most peculiar, on my other computer all I got from cabbage was a blank
>  screen.  I thought he had joined the "less is more" crowd.  I long on a
>  different machine and find it's even better than that.  He actually provides
>  some interesting information.
>
>  On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:21 PM,<[email protected]>   wrote:
>
>>  Howard wrote: "I don't want to cut the bell on my N series 8D because
>>  the
>>  bell rings
>>  forever. I suspect cutting it would destroy that. I remember one day
>>  up in Boonsboro Walter Lawson was telling me how their bells ring
>>  better than others. He whacked my N series 8D's bell with his finger,
>>  and it probably still hasn't quit ringing. He was visibly shaken, and
>>  immediately stopped telling me about that aspect of his bells'
>>  superiority!"
>>
>>  Dave W wrote
>>  I have always had enormous respect for Walter and his work, but this is
>>  one thing I could never understand.  What does a ringing bell flare
>>  mean?
>>  What does the old "thunk test" prove?  You could whack a steel mixing
>>  bowl
>>  and it work ring for a week.  But would that bowl make a good horn
>>  bell?  And,
>>  all other things being relatively equal, what would it tell you about a
>>  flare that rung and rung versus one that seemed dead when you whacked
>>  it?  You
>>  don't whack a horn to get the sound out.  You vibrate the air column.
>>  If a bell just kept ringing and ringing, would that not actually
>>  interfere
>>  with attacks, or with notes speaking, when playing runs?  And if not,
>>  why
>>  not?
>>
>>  I'm sure that a certain amount of "ringing" is probably good for a bell
>>  flare to have, but isn't possible to have too much of a good thing?  I
>>  still haven't puzzled this out, and I sure would appreciate some
>>  enlightenment. No one I've talked with about this can give me a
>>  satisfactory
>>  explanation, and I'd love to have one.
>>  ************
>>  Cabbage says:
>>
>>  Lawson did some studies of how horns sound with annealed and unannealed
>>  flares.  (These were published in the Journal of the Acoustical Society
>>  of America some while ago.)  An annealed flare is one which rings for a
>>  while when you strike it; unannealed flares generally will not.
>>
>>  The article indicates that the tone quality for the two kinds of bells
>>  was most
>>  different at high dynamic levels.  The difference was a slight one: in
>>  the annealed
>>  flares, some of the higher frequency harmonics were enhanced by 3 dB or
>>  so.  The effect was
>>  different for yellow brass bells compared to nickel silver bells.
>>
>>  If the flexibility of the wall material matters, then there are two
>>  influences it could have.   The first is that the walls could flex
>>  enough to produce
>>  audible sound.  The second is that the walls could flex enough to
>>  change the
>>  profile of the air column.
>>
>>  I am aware of a study of metal organ pipes which demonstrated the
>>  following: if an organ pipe oscillates strongly enough to make audible
>>  sound from
>>  the surface, it will also change its profile enough to shift in
>>  frequency.
>>  This is not desirable, so organ manufacturers make organ pipes stiff
>>  enough to
>>  prevent it.
>>
>>  How does this relate to the horn?  Here is some background.  When sound
>>  goes from your lips toward the bell, most of it reflects back to the
>>  lips.
>>  The low frequency parts tend to reflect in the narrow throat of the
>>  bell; the
>>  higher frequency parts of the sound reflect further out in the wider
>>  part of
>>  the bell. This means that the bell interacts most strongly with the
>>  high
>>  frequency harmonics in the sound.
>>
>>  Some more background: as you play louder, the sound level of the
>>  harmonics
>>  increases.  However, the increase of the higher frequency harmonics is
>>  much greater than the increase of the low frequency harmonics.  (If you
>>  record a horn played quietly and play the recording with the volume
>>  knob up,
>>  it doesn't sound like a loud horn.)  So the relative spectrum shifts,
>>  enhancing
>>  the higher frequency harmonics.
>>
>>  Most of the tubing of your horn is too thick and has too small a radius
>>  to oscillate very much.  The situation is different for the bell: it is
>>  much easier
>>  to bend the bell than (say) the surface of the leadpipe.
>>
>>  So what happens when you play loudly?  The higher frequency parts of the
>>  sound become more significant.  Those are the parts of the sound that
>>  interact with the bell.  As they interact with the bell, the bell can
>>  oscillate
>>  and produce sound of its own.  I speculate that this sound from the
>>  bell can be audible and therefore contribute to the spectrum.  Unlike
>>  the
>>  organ pipe, however, the frequency of the horn will not change, since
>>  the playing frequency depends on how the low frequency parts of the
>>  sound interact with
>>  the narrow throat of the bell, which is not vibrating enough to change
>>  the
>>  profile of the instrument.
>>
>>  Lawson studied the spectra of the sound produced by horns with annealed
>>  and unannealed flares.  But he did not determine how big the
>>  oscillations
>>  of the flares were, or whether those oscillations might produce audible
>>  sound.
>>
>>  Some while ago, I participated in a blind test of a horn played with
>>  annealed
>>  and unnanealed flares.  (The flares had to be changed in a different
>>  room:
>>  it is easy to tell by the clanking noises whether someone is putting an
>>  annealed or unnanealed flare on a horn.)  I was able to distinguish the
>>  two kinds of bells.  The difference was slight, but apparent at loud
>>  dynamic levels, when the tone quality of the annealed flares was a
>>  little
>>  less blatty.  (I apologize for using such obscure scientific
>>  terminology.)
>>
>>  Still, I think the ringing of the bell is quite a minor aspect of a
>>  horns sound.
>>  If you play a loud note, then stop abruptly, do you hear the bell
>>  ringing afterwards?
>>  Probably not.
>>
>>  Gotta go,
>>  Cabbage
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  post: [email protected]
>>  unsubscribe or set options at
>>  
>> https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/bgross%40airmail.net
>>
>  _______________________________________________
>  post: [email protected]
>  unsubscribe or set options at 
> https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/hornfella%40comcast.net
>
>
>  -----
>  No virus found in this message.
>  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>  Version: 10.0.1321 / Virus Database: 1500/3585 - Release Date: 04/20/11
>
>

_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to