Hey ceyockey, Brings up an interesting point. So in my head the tasking server was one task for one set of imagery. Maybe that isn't the right way to think about it. For example lets say we had pre-event imagery and then had post event imagery. Would they be the same task?
Agreed though that having a way to analyze where there isn't enough imagery coverage is useful. -Kate On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:21 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > As mentioned in at least one other message, there is substantial cloud cover > for a proportion of the work-cells in the Eastern Turkey job in OSM Task > Manager. I would suggest that where cloud cover has made it difficult to > trace, that in the comment section one put "new imagery needed - cloud cover" > or some other note indicating a desire for new imagery. As an alternative, > I'd suggest adding a checkbox to the pick-up and comment page which reads > "cloud cover - request new imagery" which would allow a quick count of how > many and what proportion of the work-cells are impacted by cloud cover. This > would also allow quick segregation of work-cells to be revisited when/if new > imagery becomes available. --Regards, OSM user ceyockey > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > _______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
