On Jan 15, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Jaakko Helleranta.com wrote:

> Hope to read something also from candidates. .. Please all candidates 
> remember that there are new (and quite possibly older) voting members (too) 
> who might not know you very well / what drives you / would drive you in HOT 
> board work. 

Thanks for this, Jaakko.

I hope that all of you have cast your votes already, but I'm happy to briefly 
talk about my hopes for HOT for the next year.

Broadly, I remind you that we all see the role of HOT as taking three basic 
forms. One is providing surge capacity for remote mapping of humanitarian 
crises and crisis-prone parts of the world. The second is training locals in 
such places to map their own communities for disaster resilience and economic 
growth. The third is to develop technology, particularly software and web-based 
services, to support the first two goals.

Over the next year, I would like to promote the following:

1) Better engagement of HOT volunteers in organizational decision making and 
policy setting. I hear frustration that worthy volunteers did not receive 
voting privileges this year. I remind you that this was in part because not 
enough people voted in the election. I think that the Board needs to take 
responsibility for this, and for promoting decision making by the membership.

For example, what qualifies as a HOT project? Did the work that some of us did 
in crowdsourcing disaster assessment for FEMA via aerial photos after Hurricane 
Sandy qualify to be a HOT project? You should decide these questions, not the 
Board.

2) Establishing transparency of decision making. Coincident to this is the 
question Katrina raised of transparency. Transparency is a challenge for the 
Board not because we wish to deceive or obfuscate, but purely because 
communicating every decision to be made with the membership entails transaction 
costs in terms of volunteer time. This must be fixed. We need to overcome these 
costs, or simply bear them as a necessary part of working together in a 
volunteer organization.

3) Establishing staff accountability. We have begun, belatedly, to establish 
standards for reporting work done by staff on HOT projects. These standards 
need to be made firm and the reporting made visible to the membership. I look 
to this not as a lack of trust in our paid staff, but purely because we should 
be accountable to each other and to our funders for the money we spend as a 
non-profit.

4) Developing training capacity for project "in the field". Right now we have a 
dearth of trainers and project managers, and the result is that our staff is 
overstretched and the Team is having to consider turning down projects because 
we lack enough competent people to execute them. We need to develop and 
implement a plan to expand our training capacity.

5) Transitioning HOT technical infrastructure to a solid foundation. Right now 
HOT's technical services are scattered across a variety of hosting platforms, 
some of which are less stable and/or more expensive than we could wish them to 
be. We need to find dedicated web hosting, donated in kind, which allows us to 
run services like the Tasking Manager, image delivery, et cetera, in a sane and 
reliable fashion.

6) Rebooting the working groups. Particularly I would like to see the 
Activation Working Group reach the goal of articulating what "HOT activation" 
means and when it happens and why.

7) Establishing a code of conduct. I want to see a working group to draw up a 
code of conduct for HOT participants. I think this is self evident but it needs 
to happen.

8) Securing funding. HOT needs to secure reliable sources of non-profit funding 
to ensure continued operations. I think we hoped that this would be part of the 
role of the Executive Director, but it hasn't happened, mostly because of the 
capacity issue mentioned above. We might start a working group for this; 
alternately, we might also hire a development director and/or grant writer to 
commit to the search for funding.

Anyway, it's a lot. Sometimes I despair of how much more time a HOT 
directorship takes up than I was promised it would. But this is a necessary 
part of the work we do and take pride in. Still, I don't think we'll accomplish 
a fraction of it without finding a way to involve each and every one of you 
more deeply in our efforts to map the world for the sake of people in need.

SDE
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Reply via email to