In addition to “quantitative data sets or any scientifically executed 
interviews?” or even anecdotal “The maps helped a lot!”, you can also “appeal 
to authority”: the US State Department’s Humanitarian Information Unit thinks 
that humanitarian mapping is so worthwhile that they set up their own “MapGive” 
page:

http://mapgive.state.gov<http://mapgive.state.gov>

“Map data is key to humanitarian and development missions. MapGive helps new 
volunteers learn to map and get involved in online tasks.”

The effectiveness of such an appeal will, of course, depend on whether someone 
trusts the “authority” :-)

— Andy

On Oct 31, 2014, at 9:25 PM, Kate Chapman 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Gideon,

Certainly it helps to have examples. There are a couple reports that might be 
of interest from the World Bank and the 2nd one is the World Bank and 
University College London.

Open Data for Resilience Initiative: Field Guide: https://www.gfdrr.org/ODRIFG
Crowdsourcing Geographic Information Use in Government: 
http://crowdgov.wordpress.com/report/

Best,

-Kate


On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Blake Girardot 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,

I am not really sure what you are saying when you say: "Is there more than "The 
maps helped a lot!""

I think feedback like that from the groups that use the data we generate are 
very convincing that the mapping we do helps on the ground. Further, for me it 
is very informative that these same humanitarian groups do ask the HOT 
specifically to do mapping for them. I do not think they would ask us if they 
did not feel it helped them.

Also, there is a somewhat different scope of the HOT mapping that is about 
empowering local communities outside of immediate crises.

Best wishes,
Blake




On 10/31/2014 1:25 PM, Gideon Hartmann wrote:
Hey mappers,

whenever I tell friends about the HOT projects, I get a lot of sceptic
responses. Most people don't see the importance of our maps and there
are even voices saying it is much more something to keep mappers
occupied than actual help.
If I go deeper into online research on the impact of HOT, I can find
some opinions here and there, but these are mostly very vague and based
on few people's opinions.
Is there more than "The maps helped a lot!" or "The maps could help in
case xxx..." anywhere?
Are there any quantitative data sets or any scientifically executed
interviews?

Keep mapping!

_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot



--
Kate Chapman
Executive Director
email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
U.S. mobile: +1 703 673 8834
Indonesian mobile: +62 82123068370

Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team
Using OpenStreetMap
for Humanitarian Response
& Economic Development
web<http://hot.openstreetmap.org/> | twitter<http://twitter.com/hotosm> | 
facebook<http://facebook.com/hotosm> | 
donate<http://hot.openstreetmap.org/donate>
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Reply via email to