FYI, this is why the OSM developers deliberately called it "changeset discussion" - we should try to stick to that term :)
2014-11-03 15:36 GMT+00:00 Blake Girardot <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > > moltonel3x on #OSM irc just noted something that we should also keep in > mind: > > There is a potential for confusion between "changeset comment" and > "changeset comments" > > I do not think it will affect us very much, but it is something we should > keep in mind in case new mappers don't quite understand there is a > difference and one we would very much like them to fill out and the other is > optional. > > Cheers, > Blake > > > > On 11/2/2014 3:42 PM, Dan S wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> OpenStreetMap has a new feature called changeset discussions - described >> here: >> >> https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2014/11/02/introducing-changeset-discussions/ >> >> It seems quite useful for feedback on HOT aerial mapping. As an >> example, I just validated a square and I added a comment on the actual >> changeset itself: >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26398525 >> >> For now, I _also_ put the same comment into the Tasking Manager item: >> http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/713#task/203 >> >> A nice thing about this new feature is that it automatically emails >> the right people to notify them of the comments. A possible negative >> is that the "conversation" is entirely public. >> >> Any other HOT validators have opinions about whether we should start >> to make more use of the feature? >> >> Best >> Dan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot _______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
