I'm happy and content and they are much easier to map than buildings but I just wondered if there was any logic behind it other than they had grown tired of mapping buildings.
Thanks John On 12 November 2014 19:14, Blake Girardot <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think you missed anything in the Project instructions for > individual trees. But with the missing maps project, OSMGeoWeek and other > assorted welcome to mapping type events it just be someone who thought it > would be fun to map in a few trees. I saw a couple of those recently when > doing some validation. > > So that is my guess: Someone just wanted to map in some trees for fun > and/or experimentation with mapping, tagging and/or rendering. As Bob Ross > might ask: "Who doesn't like happy little trees?" > > Cheers > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:45 PM, john whelan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I know they're nice but why would anyone spend time mapping trees rather >> than buildings in a HOT area? Or did I miss something in the tasks? >> >> Thanks >> >> Cheerio John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >> >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
