One reason is if the tree is a significant landmark.
Tom Taylor
On 12/11/2014 7:27 PM, john whelan wrote:
I'm happy and content and they are much easier to map than buildings but I
just wondered if there was any logic behind it other than they had grown
tired of mapping buildings.
Thanks John
On 12 November 2014 19:14, Blake Girardot <[email protected]> wrote:
I don't think you missed anything in the Project instructions for
individual trees. But with the missing maps project, OSMGeoWeek and other
assorted welcome to mapping type events it just be someone who thought it
would be fun to map in a few trees. I saw a couple of those recently when
doing some validation.
So that is my guess: Someone just wanted to map in some trees for fun
and/or experimentation with mapping, tagging and/or rendering. As Bob Ross
might ask: "Who doesn't like happy little trees?"
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:45 PM, john whelan <[email protected]>
wrote:
I know they're nice but why would anyone spend time mapping trees rather
than buildings in a HOT area? Or did I miss something in the tasks?
Thanks
Cheerio John
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
