Hi Blake, I like ideas like that! If it is rendering on OsmAnd we definitly can use it :-)
Greetings, Jorieke 2015-01-16 1:04 GMT+06:00 Blake Girardot <[email protected]>: > Hi Jorieke, > > I noticed a few buildings already mapped, like the ones in your powerpoint > slide showing "significant" buildings, often with brightly colored roofs > (blue, red, etc). > > And they had roof:colour=* tags on them already in OSM. > > Do you think those would help? It might help people find the buildings, or > identify which building is mapped: "Oh the one with the red roof" > > But I do not know if the roof:colour=* information would be available to > the people using our mapping data. > > Just wonder if you thought it would be a good idea or not. It is a small > thing, but I liked the idea when I saw it. > > Cheers, > Blake > > > > > > On 1/15/2015 7:52 PM, Jorieke Vyncke wrote: > >> Hi everybody, >> >> First of all thanks a lot for mapping in the Bangladesh tasks! It will >> be of great help! >> >> And indeed, I should have made it clearer in the presentation. I'll try >> to do a review tomorrow. >> In big follow the instructions of althio: >> >> for appartment and other large buildings --> * building=yes* >> for big individual trees which serve as landmark --> *natural=tree* >> but also bushes and a bunch of trees together which too serve as >> landmarks --> *natural=wood* >> for open areas it is okay to map --> *leisure=common* /(but you can use >> also a landcover <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landcover>tag for >> open areas like --> natural=sand or landuse=grass)/ >> >> >> Further remarks and clarification: >> >> - on buildings; indeed it would be good to collect the levels but don't >> put effort in it for now. We first need the base map of roads and big >> landmarks. This is essential to do mapping on the ground. >> - In this case building=construction is also not recommended. Every day >> things are changing here. Besides this, buildings under construction >> have often already inhabitants. Often they are just building one more >> floor on top of the existing building. (Think back to the catastrophe in >> Rana Plaza <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Savar_building_collapse>, >> you get buildings ready to collapes anytime by building like this...) So >> just stick with building=yes for now. >> - the leisure=common tag we try to adjust this one during the mapping on >> the ground >> >> If you need more clarifications, if you have questions or if you have >> ideas to make all this even more smoothly, please give us a sign! >> >> Best greetings, >> >> Jorieke >> >> >> >> >> >> 2015-01-15 16:48 GMT+06:00 althio althio <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >> >> Hi Bouke Pieter, >> >> I will try to answer and Jorieke may refine later on. >> >> > For high (appartment)buildings I assume building=yes? >> >> OK. >> >From the instructions tab: map landmarks, large buildings, not >> small ones >> [tags] >> building=yes for rectangular & round buildings - trace the building >> outline >> building=construction for walls without a roof >> [note: I assume more refinement are possible as in >> building=residential or building=apartments but this is hard to tell >> from imagery and not requested in this project] >> [note 2: To Jorieke; maybe request additional tag for large buildings >> otherwise they will not stand out if small buildings are ever traced. >> Maybe height=* or building:levels=* even if it is approximate. Anyway >> I think this is valid for any mapping: building=yes/residential + >> building:levels=6..8..10..12 + source:building:levels=estimate from >> imagery] >> [note 3: sometimes in other project, building=construction is not >> encouraged because construction seen in imagery may well be finished >> by now. So follow instructions project by project] >> >> >> > Trees: natural=tree? >> >> OK. >> from the powerpoint: map BIG trees (because they are landmarks, >> significant tree) >> [tags] >> natural=tree [I assume] >> >> >> > But how to do an open area? area=yes? >> >> No. >> from the powerpoint: map open spaces >> [tags] >> leisure=common [I assume, as usual practice for HOT] >> >> Cheers >> >> althio >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >>
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
