My bad - Robert pointed out that I pasted the wrong source data link in there (it was for TomNod Haiyan). Here's the Nepal data: https://t.co/zzSX2qrelM
-Bill On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:56 PM William Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > Kevin Bullock of DigitalGlobe has graciously shared the results of the > TomNod effort so far, licensed CC 3.0 (with a plan to specifically permit > OSM use): > - map: > https://geosprocket.cartodb.com/viz/bb5ed630-ee1e-11e4-8dca-0e018d66dc29/embed_map > > - data: http://mapperdev.tomnod.com/results/ > > It seems like there might be an opportunity in future activations (or now) > to use this data for: > > 1.) Planning and prioritization - as we move into damage assessment we're > probably going to be a step behind the TomNod participants; we should be > able to configure tasks that focus on areas with a high concentration of > damage reports and high levels of agreement. (I can't claim origination of > this idea: https://twitter.com/iheartcrowds/status/593170666662146048) > 2.) Direct import - this is more dangerous, but there's an opportunity to > directly link TomNod contributions to OSM. High-agreement damaged buildings > seems like a possible starting place. > > There are many technical considerations to be ironed out, including the > realtime nature of the TomNod data. It could benefit from a streaming API > of some sort, as well as some form of integration in the task manager. In > the meantime there's this somewhat-awkward url for overlays: > > > https://cartocdn-ashbu.global.ssl.fastly.net/geosprocket/api/v1/map/9ec70f30baf2a63e797ae341c8965733:1430273972053.4001/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png?map_key=dca6cb71991448200cc2ade26ff013da486a78ca&cache_policy=persist > > Hopefully this is an opportunity to minimize effort duplication and > leverage another motivated group of contributors. > > -Bill Morris > > > >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
