Regarding tracing buildings in #1018, Nepal "2nd pass", the *revised* instructions are unambiguous:
*"Buildings *- Trace ALL individual buildings and tag it as building=yes. For clusters of building, DO NOT enclose the whole area as one building. It is important to trace individual structures for future damage analysis." I have been doing so, even in areas already tagged landuse=residential. If tracing all individual buildings is incorrect, let me know and the instructions should be revised. I would expect consistency of instructions across the Nepal projects, e.g., regarding how to add buildings. An experienced project manager might want to review the Nepal project instructions for consistency/completeness (if not done already). Feedback from validators would be very helpful, whether "all good" or "for future do this". Thanks On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Julian Haag <[email protected]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > I had an argument with him too via PM and I kinda ticked a bit.. Felt a > bit strange getting a lesson from someone mapping for 3 months and > adding all in all 9000 nodes and having added about 100.000 in Nepal > this year myself. Invalidating tasks completed by maning added some > flavour to that one too.. :D > He wants all buildings to be mapped. Even those in landuse=residential. > > It feels like a waste of time, but the instructions are a bit ambiguous > so technically he is not wrong! > I can understand, that completing and validating a task should be the > point in wich everything needed is mapped - #1018 is marked as STEP 2. > So we are adding more details.. I am not sure what to do, but I pointed > out to him, that his attitude might discourage some mappers (as it did > to me at first (only a bit :D)). > > greetings from germany > ngt > > P.S. at the moment I try to watch the activities and (re-)validate > especially the ones done by beginners. In the comments there has to be a > kind and more exhausting text on what to do, point out learnosm and be > particular, what should be done different or be better. Try to avoid > saying what is bad ;) > > > Am 30.04.2015 um 16:51 schrieb Kretzer: > > Makes sense to me ... > > > > In task #1018 there seems to be a user with little experience and lots > of confidence invalidating dozens of tiles, arguing that "every > individual structure needs to be traced". > > The person even entered in a kind if edit war with maning. I really > feel this is a waste of precious time. > > > > In this tasks there are very specific instructions on how to validate > (which is a very good idea!). > > They do clearly say that the major highways need to be there, not all > the highways. > > > > I guess the goal is to get the relevant structures as quickly as > possible. That kind of nitpicking seems to be just slowing the job. > > > > > > Gesendet mit der GMX iPhone AppIFFK > > > > Am 30.04.15 um 15:49 schrieb Pierre GIRAUD > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I wasn't able to read all the email I got for the last 3 days, and > >> there's a ton of those. > >> > >> However, I've seen a lot of people complaining about beginner mappers > >> validating tasks even if they're not experienced enough to do so. > >> Before we find a way to avoid this with additions to the tasking > >> manager, I think there may be a workaround. > >> > >> What about making the (100% done) projects in a private mode > >> temporarily and give access to a limited list of users so that they > >> can validate the done tasks. > >> > >> This could be used for this project for example: > >> http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1008 > >> > >> This would prevent beginners to come to this project, wonder what to > >> do and then validate tasks even if they don't know what they're doing. > >> > >> My 2 cents. > >> > >> Pierre > >> > >> -- > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >> | Pierre GIRAUD > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> HOT mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > > > _______________________________________________ > > HOT mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVQ6WqAAoJEMUCiYazPkhKgBcP/09YmyKW4fzupreyDvd7rp36 > TZkG0G6gPPL3Wu+GmOpb+xznT04Mz4oBUAJDt6JvxlxK8y0QrcUdl1BY9xSzPK8N > +DGZ8R6boogYNqcifhxpaBF7estqMq7PnfJxzppVwEygX0RxABSrolwm4ZXr7giK > lbq1k3EczfEhXrvULTUNfT06fqnDksn62ga/SwYZGen0oMCsgrrQA7H6u8F5hMx2 > yS73keCnxdZ9nbJlxOT4wPHK3DuAs7QWgsiBGAOQEu8ytA9gkAe4LRqJIpQWxVdR > WAb9BfaQk1FQ393GvHfGP3K+fI25MfT5B0aLxAOQYDREUNjzbKlnxudTK++p5V3R > sIpVCKpiP4jDhOPkMXPbSMETkBw55BXC913C2kvEq54RXgQMw7C+EbvIlxKeDJ2O > frOIngIyT+eqNMUnQOe/Tuvn9h3R5Gcx/3qBIeZLI8vwslbIpDs9a2XKsbutp/xk > tcsjpqEhyhmY0Fw81VM+H29PeemUzo1IHArYY2eyb4lBhWy8gw3qnvsTSvp9JSu1 > I1fQLN0MQLihh3wC8A4uWKcRTRPf8MSmv72mQjg52gSE2HqAvmB0r3fQLaku5ZX4 > KQE8PtKM5BEITd5Xw12yFQa27kwqL0pXqrDjiRzVRIBehp2Gq/1L7xia88Yi1A1B > Rt+l7Mncu3UBWIjNRHtN > =4rz2 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
