Yances
I think that we should keep the duplicates for now.
We are in the emergency and did not had time to think about the various
problems when we created this job.
I prefer that we keep duplicate, otherwise we would loose info about the
residential area.
It should be easy to mange once the job is completed and revise the
landuse=brownfield.
We can define a nepal earthquake event related tag to report this and
facilitate later the database management.
regard
Pierre
De : "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
À : S Volk <[email protected]>
Cc : "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Envoyé le : Samedi 2 mai 2015 13h34
Objet : Re: [HOT] #1024 landuse=brownfield + landuse=residential
I think a better aproach to this could be update previous polygon tags, from
"landuse=residential" to "landuse=brownfield" and erase duplicated polygon.
2015-05-01 17:55 GMT-05:00 S Volk <[email protected]>:
Hi, please, one question:I'm tracing a "landuse=brownfield" poligon for
recently disappeared homes (comparing DigitalGlobe 2015-04-29 with both Bing
and MapGive / HIU april 2015 images, ) over a place where there was already a
"landuse=residential" poligon (probably will be a common case). I ask: is it
ok, doesn't it happen any kind of conflict for a "landuse" over another
"landuse", like conflict in rendering brownfield over residential, or any kind
of conflict for identification? // Also, no sign of tents in the neigborhood of
these demolished buildings, confirming reports that rescue haven't arrived yet
to many distant place. // Thanks - Sérgio (user:SergioAJV)
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
