Dont forget that we work to locate people at risk after 8 days without any
relief. People have lost everything under the houses ruins including food. It
is important to report all the residential areas to assure to provide them
relief.
We should remove the instructions 20 or so. Did not notice. This is valuable if
you trace all buildings under clusters of 20. Isolated areas, even under 20
houses should be reported too.regard
Pierre
De : Kretzer <[email protected]>
À : Suzan Reed <[email protected]>
Cc : "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Envoyé le : Samedi 2 mai 2015 19h07
Objet : Re: [HOT] Experienced mapper please verify: nonexistent stream on Task
#1955, other mistakes
Hi again, I just noticed Emmor beat me to the answer ...
I wanted to ad that it can be useful to look at the history of changes in a
case like this. Sometime I do this to make sure if the other person possibly
had more recent information (or local knowledge, as there was a lot of mapping
activity in Nepal in the last years - in some areas I have seen many edits by
users with Nepalese sounding names).
You can find the history if you change to the map view and click on the
"History" tab on the top. In this case there were several very new users
contributing.
As to the residential areas, I would draw the line around the larger clusters
of buildings and leave the others outside. The instructions in this project
specify that it should be around "20 or so" buildings. Mappers' styles vary,
personally I don't like the tiny "residential areas".
The important thing is that the buildings are there, so that rescuers can see
were people are living.
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 03. Mai 2015 um 00:47 Uhr
> Von: "Suzan Reed" <[email protected]>
> An: Kretzer <[email protected]>
> Betreff: Re: Aw: [HOT] Experienced mapper please verify: nonexistent stream
> on Task #1955, other mistakes
>
> Hi,
>
> I questioned the large areas, yet villages in Nepal are really spread out
> over big areas. I'm not sure what to do but to leave them for not and wait.
>
> Suzan
> Portland, Oregon USA
>
>
> On May 2, 2015, at 3:42 PM, Kretzer wrote:
>
> Hi Susan,
> zooming out you can see that this is at the bottom of a quite large valley,
> so it is very likely that there is a stream, even if it isn't clearly
> visible. Maybe the person who drew it was using different imagery. I think
> it's not in the right place in the middle section (near the mapped path), but
> I would prolong it to the river in the east. it's not the most important
> feature at the moment, though.
>
> What disturbs me more in the tile are the huge residential areas - those
> boundaries should be close to the buildings. They are also overlapping in one
> place, and there is an area within an area in the western part. Both
> shouldn't happen.
>
> I'm just a semi-noob myself, but I am quite sure about these questions.
>
>
>
> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 03. Mai 2015 um 00:02 Uhr
> > Von: "Suzan Reed" <[email protected]>
> > An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > Betreff: [HOT] Experienced mapper please verify: nonexistent stream on Task
> > #1955, other mistakes
> >
> > Someone with advanced mapping experience, please review.
> >
> > There isn't a stream at the locations listed below. Seem to be lots of
> > mistakes on this task. Might be new information, or?
> >
> > #1018 - Nepal Earthquake, 2015, detailed mapping 2nd pass
> >
> > Task #1955
> >
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&#map=20/28.08949/84.74058
> >
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&#map=16/28.0890/84.7460
> >
> > PLEASE ADVISE ME ON WHAT TO DO WITH THIS TASK.
> > _______________________________________________
> > HOT mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
