These I like perhaps we could also include projects actively validated for those mappers who like to see some feedback.
Cheerio John On 6 December 2015 at 21:35, Daniel O'Connor <[email protected]> wrote: > I raised https://github.com/hotosm/osm-tasking-manager2/issues/718 > focused only on the front page list/different purposes it serves. Ideas or > examples of other 'task priority' UI encouraged. > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Jo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Something that baffles me about the TM is that when a task is split, the >> original tile seems to disappear from existence, even though people could >> still have a reference to it, they will get a not found message and they >> can't read the comments anymore. >> >> As a long time OSM contritbutor, I started doing validation work. I >> always try to read the instructions, but I also find I'm jumping between >> tasks quite often. It poses its own challenges... Anyway, I tend to prefer >> the tasks where not every building needs to be mapped, but sometimes it's >> hard to find the middle ground. In a tile where almost nothing is visible, >> I'd try to map at least something like the rivers and the occasional >> footpath. By mapping the rivers it becomes easier to find the 'roads' where >> they cross the rivers. And the rivers are nice reference points by >> themselves as well, of course. >> >> Polyglot >> >> 2015-12-06 17:58 GMT+01:00 Dale Kunce <[email protected]>: >> >>> Ralf and John. >>> I don't either of you are ranting but providing good feedback that >>> aligns with my own thinking about tasks. I favor smaller tasks that can be >>> completed quickly rather than huge tasks that take multiple mappers to >>> complete. >>> >>> One thing that I think we are moving towards is a set of guidelines for >>> TM PMs. This will standardize a lot of language and help keep tasks >>> manageable. I'm working on a draft that I'll share with the HOT and TM PM >>> lists once it's ready to share. >>> >>> Thanks as always for your time. >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015, 11:35 AM Ralf Stephan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> The key for moving people from one-time to many-time contribution is >>>> motivation. >>>> I have seen volunteers suddenly much more motivated when I commented >>>> with more >>>> than a few words on a validation I did. But at least equally important >>>> is task and tile size. >>>> Large tasks are tackled more than a few times only by long-time >>>> contributors. Why have >>>> such big tasks when there is no hurry? I know I am more motivated if >>>> tile sizes are small. >>>> I'm sure it's more so with new contributors, so why have such large >>>> tiles per default, if >>>> they aren't completed anyway? Everything is made ever more casual, but >>>> I need 30-60 >>>> minutes to complete the smallest tile size to my satisfaction. Please >>>> increase the split >>>> count AND make the default tile size smaller, or you will never get >>>> enough completed tiles by people who want to invest rather 15 than minutes. >>>> >>>> Sorry for ranting >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> HOT mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HOT mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
