Yes, that was really my point.  perhaps I should have been more explicit.

So my question is really which is the later imagery?  Bing or Worldview

David

On 20/02/2016 14:24, Mike Thompson wrote:
John,

I agree the most recent imagery should be used, but how do we know the collection date for the Bing imagery?

Mike

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:14 AM, john whelan <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I imagine the most recent imagery should be used.  Some imagery is
    quite old so more buildings may have been built.

    Cheerio John

    On 20 February 2016 at 09:00, David Groom <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        OSM Tasking manaager #1129  imagery priority

        When there is a difference between detailed Bing imagery and
        the WorldView-2, 07 Nov 2014; DigitalGlobe, NextView imagery
        which should take precedence?

        An example can be seen to the south west of the sports pitch
        here http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/10.13336/124.85114

        There are two small buildings north of the DepEd building on
        Bing, not seen on Worldview

        There is a small group of trees to the immediate west of The
        DedEd building on Bing, but buildings can be seen here in
        Worldview

        This is a minor, but easy to appreciate example. I have also
        come across quite a few buildings traced from Bing (and still
        visible on the Bing imagery), but there is no evidence of
        these on Wordview imagery

        David

        _______________________________________________
        HOT mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot



    _______________________________________________
    HOT mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot




_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Reply via email to