Emmor, Thanks, that is what I thought. I am not adding trees, I just noticed someone else had and they had tagged them in a manner that didn't match the common practice as I understand it.
Mike On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Vao Matua <[email protected]> wrote: > Mike, > > I would suggest that natural=wood should be the first tag, if the area is > a park then the next tag could be leisure=park. The OSM page on forest > <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dforest>has good > descriptions. > > In Ethiopia often the Orthodox churches are in the middle of a small > church forests and would be tagged natural=wood, and land_use=religious. > > I love trees but would shy away from tagging individual trees except for > landmark type specimen. There is a lot of mapping to do without mapping > trees. > > Regards, > > Emmor > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Mike Thompson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> In #1544 (or in any HOT project) are we marking areas that are covered in >> trees as leisure = park? Although it is not universally agreed upon, the >> tendency in the rest of OSM is to tag these as natural=wood. See for >> example [1]. Also, individual trees (represented as nodes) are tagged the >> same way and normally those would be tagged natural=tree. >> >> Mike >> >> [1] http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1544#task/67 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >> >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
