Thanks Dale & Mikel,
JOSM and iD are just tools, each with their strengths and weaknesses.
I have made thousands of edits with both and demonstrate both when I lead
mapathons, most people choose to edit tasks with JOSM, but many like iD,
the important thing is to coach them to create good data.
If the HOT community can't handle a simple change of moving an ambiguous
term that describes what something is not ("Unclassified") to a term that
better describes what a feature represents on the ground ("Minor road")
then maybe the "Open" in OSM and HOT should be replaced with "Closed"?
It will take a long time to map the third planet from the sun, but we've
made a good start.
Emmor
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Dale Kunce <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm totally against HOT maintaining a fork of ID. It sounds simple enough
> in the beginning but will be more difficult as time goes on.
>
> Updating training materials is a pretty simple thing to do as we should
> try and refresh them regularly anyway.
> On Mar 6, 2016 10:55 PM, "Mikel Maron" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> People, get a grip.
>>
>> There are a lot of cool ideas that have risen and re-risen in this
>> thread. Custom iD presets for HOT tasks, tighter coordination between
>> training guides and software release cycles, better management of tags
>> across OSM.
>>
>> HOT excels in emergencies, but this isn't one. The label "unclassified
>> road" has changed to "minor road". This is a good thing (
>> https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2916) and something we can
>> easily get our minds around.
>>
>> -Mikel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
