I take that back, it's not entirely useless. We only need to figure out a way to consolidate the lines where people forgot to add the specific code with the ones where they did add it. I guess Pandas or R should be able to do that, but I'm still rather busy validating the tasks.
This is the url with ULG added: http://www.missingmaps.org/leaderboards/#/belgiumunis,ulb,vub,ugent,kul,unamur,ucl,ulg Polyglot 2016-04-18 17:23 GMT+02:00 Jo <[email protected]>: > It's rather worthless this way anyway, but Liège doesn't seem to be > present in the comparison. > > Jo > > 2016-04-18 17:00 GMT+02:00 joost schouppe <[email protected]>: > >> And it's back. But either something went terribly wrong, or our mappers >> only added the extra tags in a good 10% of changesets... >> >> >> http://www.missingmaps.org/leaderboards/#/belgiumunis,ulb,vub,ugent,kul,unamur,ucl >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >> >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
