Hi Humberto and John, I really encourage you to look at ways of doing large scale validations.
One way I have done it in the past is to download the tasking manager either project area, or even the individual task square outlines and load them up in JOSM, then just do large scale validation of the area using the task outlines as a guide. If it is my project, and it is archived, I won't bother to mark the task squares as validated individually, I just validate the whole AoI. If I was better at things, I would actually put in a note in the instructions, even on the archived project that says it was 100% validated outside of the TM. (allowing validators to mark mass task squares as validated would be an improvement to the TM. Would be nice to checkout mass task squares too for the most experienced validators and project managers to work on) If it is not my project, I will mass validate 5 or 10 task squares at a time, then just go into the project and review, mark valid, review, mark valid, etc all the task squares I validated en mass with JOSM. Cheers, blake ---------------------------------------------------- Blake Girardot Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team Vice President, HOT Board of Directors skype: jblakegirardot HOT Core Team Contact: i...@hotosm.org On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 4:01 PM, hyan...@gmail.com <hyan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello John, > > 2016-04-24 8:51 GMT-05:00 John Whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> I'm seeing projects archived fairly quickly without validation. >> > > A team of validators will start with this ones from tomorrow, with the > objective to review and validate all this squares. > >> >> Of the validation I have done I've seen crossing ways and highways almost >> meeting on a project that was supposed to be Highways only for experienced >> JOSM users. >> > Yes, I'm seen task marks as done with any update too. Thanks for your > validations. > >> >> JOSM validation should have highlighted these errors before uploading. > > > Yes... >> >> >> I won't bother to mention the other problems I've seen but I assume some >> thought has been given to the matter? >> > Yes, as I mention before, a group of validators start from tomorrow, thanks > for your welcome comments. > >> >> Thanks John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> HOT@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> > > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > _______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
