Have a look at the report by Timo Lüge I linked earlier, it may be exactly what 
you’re asking for: a wide-ranging evaluation of the MSF Ebola campaign, 
commissioned by the MSF, but published in a form that is useful to other 
organisations.

The link again:
http://reliefweb.int/report/liberia/gis-support-msf-ebola-response-liberia-guinea-and-sierra-leone-2015-case-study-2nd

m.


> On 9 Jun 2016, at 13:45, Laura O'Grady <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> Based on my experience in order to measure this (in an outcome evaluation) 
> you would have to build steps into the project before you start (determine 
> the nature of the evaluation, establish which variables should be measured, 
> how they should be operationalized, etc.). 
> 
> Does MSF or UNAID not conduct their own program evaluations? Do they not need 
> such metrics for their own purposes (e.g. funding, accountability)? Perhaps 
> they do but these documents are white papers and for internal use only.
> 
> Laura
> 
> Laura O'Grady
> [email protected]
> 
>> On Jun 9, 2016, at 3:24 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>> Hi John,
>> 
>> you're right, it's difficult to evaluate the impact since the data can be 
>> used afterwards in so many different ways. But what I'm interested in is the 
>> initial phase, like e.g. if MSF or USAID are implementing mapping activities 
>> together with HOT, what is the outcome of these projects? For what are they 
>> using the data excatly, how do they implement it in their workflow and so on.
>> 
>> To evaluate the education side of the local contributers would be also kinda 
>> interesting to see
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> Stefan (seike_)
>> 
>> Am 09.06.2016 00:00 schrieb john whelan:
>>> I think part of the problem for this is the multiple uses made of OSM
>>> maps. They might be mapped by one group but used by another and some
>>> charities using them are very small and how would you measure this?
>>> Including the education side of having locals contribute to the map?
>>> Cheerio John
>>>> On 8 Jun 2016 5:18 p.m., "Stefan Eikenbusch" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hello HOT-Community
>>>> I’m wondering if there are any papers dealing with the evaluation
>>>> of using Open Data (especially OSM) for humanitarian aid, DRR and/or
>>>> economic development?
>>>> Are there any plans to evaluate HOT-Activations like e.g. in Nepal,
>>>> Ecuador, etc. and it’s impact on the local work for humanitarian
>>>> aid workers? I think this could be kinda interesting also for new
>>>> mappers to know how the data is being used.
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Stefan (seike_)
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> HOT mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot [1]
>>> Links:
>>> ------
>>> [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Reply via email to