> On Oct 25, 2017, at 7:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Send HOT mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of HOT digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Livestream TODAY 1 PM US ET: HOT featured in The Role of > Citizen Science Observatories and Crowdsourcing Community in the > Global Earth Observation System of Systems (Lea Shanley) > 2. Re: TM3 and validation (Florian Kratochwil) > 3. Re: TM3 and validation (Michael Heißmeier) > 4. Re: TM3 and validation (john whelan) > 5. Map Size in new Task Manager (Richard Nairn) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:10:28 -0400 > From: Lea Shanley <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], crisismappers > <[email protected]> > Subject: [HOT] Livestream TODAY 1 PM US ET: HOT featured in The Role > of Citizen Science Observatories and Crowdsourcing Community in the > Global Earth Observation System of Systems > Message-ID: > <CAL10a13jpnnEMLkjrvejxkPAq1UgbdMmkfgrnvR=whf5rnb...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Mikel Maron will be giving a presentation on the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap > Team today! > > > *The Role of Citizen Science Observatories and Crowdsourcing Community in > the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS)* > > A Group on Earth Observations Plenary XIV Side Event > *Tuesday, October 24, 2017 from 1:00 - 5:30 PM EST* > > The growth of citizen science is a global phenomenon. In the United States, > the scientific impacts of citizen science are recognized by 60 federal > agencies and organizations, which coordinate and support hundreds of citizen > science projects. In Europe, the European Commission continues to fund > Citizen Observatories, beginning with the FP7 Programme and extending > through active projects Ground Truth 2.0, LandSense, SCENT, and GROW. > Similar initiatives are emerging in other parts of the world. > > GEO can benefit from these initiatives if standards and best practices in > managing (collection, representation, annotation, processing) crowd-sourced > data are promoted. There is a need to explore the linkages of citizen data > to the GEOSS and its common infrastructure (GCI), identify activities > necessary for scaling up (examples are GBIF contributions, Mosquito > Alert-UN...), and investigate methods and tools to integrate > citizens-generated data with authoritative ones. This should be done in > coordination with other GEO initiatives such as GEOBON. In this meeting, we > will know more about existing citizen science projects and observatories > and will discuss evolving standards and best practices for citizen-observed > data management and ways to integrate citizen-acquired with established > data sources. > > ------------------------------ > > *LIVE STREAM:* > *Watch the livestream event and submit your questions for the > panelists here > <https://southbigdatahub.us11.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b1c2e11cb37fc242dfa8e178b&id=4430d20984&e=53c098953f>.* > > *Tweet your questions to the panelists using hashtag **#GEOCitSci *Also > follow the GEO Plenary with *#GEOWeek17* > > For more information and archived video (when posted) click here > <https://southbigdatahub.us11.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b1c2e11cb37fc242dfa8e178b&id=640eb15e93&e=53c098953f> > . > > ------------------------------ > > *AGENDA* > > 1:00 PM *Welcoming Remarks* > > 1:15 PM *Citizen Science Programs and Observatories: Lightning > Talks* > > Moderator: Dr. Lea Shanley, South Hub > Speakers: > > - Maria Krommyda, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems > - Mikel Maron, Humanitarian Open Street Maps > - Laetitia Navarro, GEO BON > - Joan Masó, Center for Ecological Research and Forestry > - Andreas Matheus, Secure Dimensions GmbH > > 2:15 PM > *Tools, Best Practices, and Standards for Utilizing > Citizen Science for GEOSS* > > Moderator: Krystal Wilson, Secure World Foundation > Speakers: > > - Anne Bowser, Wilson Center > - Dixon Butler, Youth Learning as Citizen Environmental Scientists > - Max Craglia, Joint Research Center > - Steffen Fritz, International Institute for Applied Science System > Analysis > > 3:15 PM *Group Discussion: Prioritization of Citizen Science as GEO > Activity* > > Moderator: Joan Masó, Center for Ecological Research and Forestry > > 5:00 PM *Closing Remarks and Next Steps* > > 5:30 Adjourn > > *Workshop Steering Committee:* > > - Joan Masó, Center for Ecological Research and Forestry (CREAF) > - Krystal Wilson, Secure World Foundation (SWF) > - Lea Shanley, South Big Data Innovation Hub, University of North > Carolina at Chapel Hill > - Anne Bowser, The Wilson Center > > > Cheers, > > Lea > > Lea Shanley, PhD > co-Executive Director, South Big Data Innovation Hub > http://www.linkedin.com/in/LeaShanley > [email protected] > @Lea_Shanley > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20171024/8a2c47cd/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:34:04 +0200 > From: Florian Kratochwil <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [HOT] TM3 and validation > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" > > After checking out the new TM as validator I can say: Respect! I like > it! It is way better than before and I am looking forward to validating. > > I had one problem when validating multiple tiles of a user in JOSM > today. I clicked the button to download the data to JOSM but I didn't > get any OSM Data. I just got the imagery and the TM-Tile-Borders, but > the "OSM-Data"-Set was empty. I guess this is not what it should be? In > single tile validation I get the OSM-Data. > > And I am curious what is behind the random task selection for > validation. It is really random or is there some algorithm behind which > gives me users which > - haven't been validated recently or > - have been invalidated recently or > - are beginners or > - have finished the tile just minutes ago or > - ...? > > I really was waiting for this button, because now validators can focus > on validating without browsing for tiles. I think I will use this button > a lot. > > Cheers, > Florian > > Am 2017-10-21 um 22:27 schrieb john whelan: >> I'm after the most recently mapped tile because that one is the way >> they are currently mapping and that's what I'd like to correct. >> >> If I get a name that gives me one or more tiles. Which is the most >> recent? If they are mapping in a group they may well have corrected >> themselves or even by themselves they may have experimented then read >> the documentation and corrected themselves. >> >> I've had mappers with three of four years experience who have >> benefited from feedback. One was using highway=track rather than >> highway=unclassified because he once put in name=unclassified in JOSM >> got an error there after used highway=track. English even the US >> variety wasn't their first language. >> >> You should know by now I'm awkward and do things differently. >> >> Cheerio John >> >> On 21 October 2017 at 16:08, Blake Girardot <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I think you just want to sort by "last feedback" then. >> >> That should tell you how long it has been since the mapper last got >> feedback and if it is the same as their registration time, you know >> they have probably never gotten feedback. >> >> Can you try that and see if it is a fair replacement for your most >> recently mapped task. I think it will get you the same thing >> essentially. >> >> regards >> blake >> >> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 3:48 PM, john whelan >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> Remember I'm basically lazy. I do two things when I validate. >> The first is >>> clean up the second is provide feedback. >>> >>> The sooner someone receives feedback the better the response. >> You get more >>> tiles out of them and they are of a higher quality. This means >> less clean >>> up for me to do. >>> >>> Someone confirmed the feedback loop and confirmed that within 24 >> hours is >>> best then you get a trickle down effect so after a week you get >> much lower >>> responses. >>> >>> The other part is if I'm validating tiles that are a week old am >> I going to >>> annoy the mapper because they may have already corrected their >> bad habits as >>> a result of earlier feedback and yet these are still being >> mentioned. So >>> the mapper doesn't get a warm fuzzy and to be honest it takes >> longer for me >>> to provide proper feedback than to have mapped the tile myself. >> Remember >>> I'm lazy. >>> >>> So when I land on a project the ideal is validate the most >> recently mapped >>> tiles first then quietly clean up the rest. >>> >>> Does that make it clearer? It's about problem avoidance or >> prevention >>> rather than verifying the mapping as such. >>> >>> The how long have they been mapping helps, some mappers I'll >> take a quick >>> glance at, newer mappers it's zoom in and look for a few more >> things. >>> >>> Thanks John >>> >>> On 21 Oct 2017 3:32 pm, "Blake Girardot HOT/OSM" >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi John, >>>> >>>> If you could explain just a bit more about why the most recently >>>> mapped task is your main priority (sometimes)? >>>> >>>> I do not understand. >>>> >>>> I understand it has something to do with someone who mapped 3 >> months >>>> ago, we now also send emails so time passed since they last >> mapped is >>>> much much less of an issue (Martin is going to maybe look at >> redoing >>>> his analysis). >>>> >>>> We actually started off with what you are asking for, but feedback >>>> from users was they were much more interested in getting to the >> newest >>>> mappers the fastest, which is what we ended up going with. >>>> >>>> Maybe it is easy to add back in, but that table is already >> pretty crowded. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Blake >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:37 PM, john whelan >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>> wrote: >>>>> I've found what you are doing on the video, your accent is >> fine you know >>>>> of >>>>> course that people studying English like what it is spoke >> years ago >>>>> travel >>>>> to parts of the US to record the Americans as their language >> has been >>>>> isolated for many years so it much closer to English what was >> spoke when >>>>> their families emigrated. >>>>> >>>>> Yes I can pick out a user who registered ten minutes ago and >> the tiles >>>>> they >>>>> mapped but that isn't what I'm after. I'm after the most >> recently >>>>> mapped >>>>> tile and that's the one that is the most valuable to give >> feedback on. >>>>> >>>>> By the way I'm using cut and paste on the name displayed >> below to give >>>>> feedback with the @ sign or <Crtl>i to grab the username in >> JOSM, its >>>>> faster >>>>> than typing it in as you were doing. Some mappers are >> naughty and do >>>>> not >>>>> completely map a tile, but their mapping still requires >> feedback even if >>>>> someone else finishes it off. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Cheerio John >>>>> >>>>> On 21 October 2017 at 14:20, Blake Girardot >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi John, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you very much for your feedback on the TM3, this and the >>>>>> previous. And thank you for putting them in GitHub, that is >> really the >>>>>> best place for them. >>>>>> >>>>>> The TM3 has better than the most recently mapped task. >>>>>> >>>>>> The most recently mapped task tells you nothing about the >> skill level >>>>>> or the newness of the mapper. It could have been completed >> by me, 7+ >>>>>> years in OSM. >>>>>> >>>>>> What I really want is to find when I am validating is the newest >>>>>> mapper who someone has not already given feedback. >>>>>> >>>>>> No point in me giving a 2 hour old user feedback if you got >> one of >>>>>> their tasks 5 mins ago. >>>>>> >>>>>> That is what you can see in the Tasking Manager 3. >>>>>> >>>>>> I know my accent bugs you, so I made a silent video of how I >> use the >>>>>> TM3 to get the newest mappers feedback as fast as possible: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://youtu.be/BX8rzi2NqQY >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me know what you think of the workflow in the video if >> you would >>>>>> please. >>>>>> >>>>>> Respectfully, >>>>>> blake >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 11:06 AM, john whelan >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Typically when I validate I validate the most recently >> mapped tiles >>>>>>> first >>>>>>> working on the principle that the faster feedback the more >> likely it >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> be effective. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If someone has already changed their habits telling them >> that two >>>>>>> villages >>>>>>> two kilometers apart are probably not connected by a >> primary highway >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> by >>>>>>> a minor road three months after they have mapped is a >> waste of time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can't see how to do this in TM3. I need a link to the tile. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> HOT mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> Blake Girardot >>>>>> OSM Wiki - >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot> >>>>>> HOTOSM Member - https://hotosm.org/users/blake_girardot >> <https://hotosm.org/users/blake_girardot> >>>>>> skype: jblakegirardot >>>>>> Live OSM Mapper-Support channel - >> https://hotosm-slack.herokuapp.com/ >> <https://hotosm-slack.herokuapp.com/> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> HOT mailing list >>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>>> Blake Girardot >>>> Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HOT mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> ---------------------------------------------------- >> Blake Girardot >> OSM Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot> >> HOTOSM Member - https://hotosm.org/users/blake_girardot >> <https://hotosm.org/users/blake_girardot> >> skype: jblakegirardot >> Live OSM Mapper-Support channel - >> https://hotosm-slack.herokuapp.com/ >> <https://hotosm-slack.herokuapp.com/> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20171024/8fad8135/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:51:46 +0200 > From: Michael Heißmeier <[email protected]> > To: Florian Kratochwil <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [HOT] TM3 and validation > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" > > Hi Florian, > > Florian Kratochwil, 2017-10-24 18:34: >> After checking out the new TM as validator I can say: Respect! I like it! It >> is way better than before and I am looking forward to validating. >> >> I had one problem when validating multiple tiles of a user in JOSM today. I >> clicked the button to download the data to JOSM but I didn't get any OSM >> Data. >> I just got the imagery and the TM-Tile-Borders, but the "OSM-Data"-Set was >> empty. I guess this is not what it should be? In single tile validation I >> get >> the OSM-Data. >> >> > This is intentional. Imagine you select several tiles which are at different > corners of the project area. As JOSM can only download within a rectangular > area > you would end up downloading all data within the whole project area which > will > probably not even work because of the huge amount of data. > > > Best Regards > > /Michael > (osm:michael63) / > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20171024/ca59a8f5/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 13:01:13 -0400 > From: john whelan <[email protected]> > To: Florian Kratochwil <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [HOT] TM3 and validation > Message-ID: > <caj-ex1g3-2m4z3r1b+4zqmsvmptwwuqvydvio5m7kjfuawd...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >> I had one problem when validating multiple tiles of a user in JOSM today. > I clicked the button to download the data to JOSM but I didn't get any OSM > Data. I just got the imagery and the TM-Tile-Borders, but the > "OSM-Data"-Set was empty. I guess this is not what it should be? In single > tile validation I get the OSM-Data. > > I use hovering over the start button to identify the tiles then validating > the tiles individually. > > As Michael has commented trying to slippy map the area and download more > than one tile is awkward and its easier to validate one tile at a time. > Unfortunately when you download tiles they go to a new layer so you can't > do checks across all the tiles at once. > > Cheerio John > > On 24 October 2017 at 12:34, Florian Kratochwil <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> After checking out the new TM as validator I can say: Respect! I like it! >> It is way better than before and I am looking forward to validating. >> >> I had one problem when validating multiple tiles of a user in JOSM today. >> I clicked the button to download the data to JOSM but I didn't get any OSM >> Data. I just got the imagery and the TM-Tile-Borders, but the >> "OSM-Data"-Set was empty. I guess this is not what it should be? In single >> tile validation I get the OSM-Data. >> >> And I am curious what is behind the random task selection for validation. >> It is really random or is there some algorithm behind which gives me users >> which >> - haven't been validated recently or >> - have been invalidated recently or >> - are beginners or >> - have finished the tile just minutes ago or >> - ...? >> >> I really was waiting for this button, because now validators can focus on >> validating without browsing for tiles. I think I will use this button a lot. >> >> Cheers, >> Florian >> >> >> Am 2017-10-21 um 22:27 schrieb john whelan: >> >> I'm after the most recently mapped tile because that one is the way they >> are currently mapping and that's what I'd like to correct. >> >> If I get a name that gives me one or more tiles. Which is the most >> recent? If they are mapping in a group they may well have corrected >> themselves or even by themselves they may have experimented then read the >> documentation and corrected themselves. >> >> I've had mappers with three of four years experience who have benefited >> from feedback. One was using highway=track rather than >> highway=unclassified because he once put in name=unclassified in JOSM got >> an error there after used highway=track. English even the US variety >> wasn't their first language. >> >> You should know by now I'm awkward and do things differently. >> >> Cheerio John >> >> On 21 October 2017 at 16:08, Blake Girardot <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I think you just want to sort by "last feedback" then. >>> >>> That should tell you how long it has been since the mapper last got >>> feedback and if it is the same as their registration time, you know >>> they have probably never gotten feedback. >>> >>> Can you try that and see if it is a fair replacement for your most >>> recently mapped task. I think it will get you the same thing >>> essentially. >>> >>> regards >>> blake >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 3:48 PM, john whelan <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Remember I'm basically lazy. I do two things when I validate. The >>> first is >>>> clean up the second is provide feedback. >>>> >>>> The sooner someone receives feedback the better the response. You get >>> more >>>> tiles out of them and they are of a higher quality. This means less >>> clean >>>> up for me to do. >>>> >>>> Someone confirmed the feedback loop and confirmed that within 24 hours >>> is >>>> best then you get a trickle down effect so after a week you get much >>> lower >>>> responses. >>>> >>>> The other part is if I'm validating tiles that are a week old am I >>> going to >>>> annoy the mapper because they may have already corrected their bad >>> habits as >>>> a result of earlier feedback and yet these are still being mentioned. >>> So >>>> the mapper doesn't get a warm fuzzy and to be honest it takes longer >>> for me >>>> to provide proper feedback than to have mapped the tile myself. >>> Remember >>>> I'm lazy. >>>> >>>> So when I land on a project the ideal is validate the most recently >>> mapped >>>> tiles first then quietly clean up the rest. >>>> >>>> Does that make it clearer? It's about problem avoidance or prevention >>>> rather than verifying the mapping as such. >>>> >>>> The how long have they been mapping helps, some mappers I'll take a >>> quick >>>> glance at, newer mappers it's zoom in and look for a few more things. >>>> >>>> Thanks John >>>> >>>> On 21 Oct 2017 3:32 pm, "Blake Girardot HOT/OSM" < >>> [email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi John, >>>>> >>>>> If you could explain just a bit more about why the most recently >>>>> mapped task is your main priority (sometimes)? >>>>> >>>>> I do not understand. >>>>> >>>>> I understand it has something to do with someone who mapped 3 months >>>>> ago, we now also send emails so time passed since they last mapped is >>>>> much much less of an issue (Martin is going to maybe look at redoing >>>>> his analysis). >>>>> >>>>> We actually started off with what you are asking for, but feedback >>>>> from users was they were much more interested in getting to the newest >>>>> mappers the fastest, which is what we ended up going with. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe it is easy to add back in, but that table is already pretty >>> crowded. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Blake >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:37 PM, john whelan <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> I've found what you are doing on the video, your accent is fine you >>> know >>>>>> of >>>>>> course that people studying English like what it is spoke years ago >>>>>> travel >>>>>> to parts of the US to record the Americans as their language has been >>>>>> isolated for many years so it much closer to English what was spoke >>> when >>>>>> their families emigrated. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes I can pick out a user who registered ten minutes ago and the >>> tiles >>>>>> they >>>>>> mapped but that isn't what I'm after. I'm after the most recently >>>>>> mapped >>>>>> tile and that's the one that is the most valuable to give feedback >>> on. >>>>>> >>>>>> By the way I'm using cut and paste on the name displayed below to >>> give >>>>>> feedback with the @ sign or <Crtl>i to grab the username in JOSM, its >>>>>> faster >>>>>> than typing it in as you were doing. Some mappers are naughty and do >>>>>> not >>>>>> completely map a tile, but their mapping still requires feedback >>> even if >>>>>> someone else finishes it off. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheerio John >>>>>> >>>>>> On 21 October 2017 at 14:20, Blake Girardot <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi John, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you very much for your feedback on the TM3, this and the >>>>>>> previous. And thank you for putting them in GitHub, that is really >>> the >>>>>>> best place for them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The TM3 has better than the most recently mapped task. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The most recently mapped task tells you nothing about the skill >>> level >>>>>>> or the newness of the mapper. It could have been completed by me, 7+ >>>>>>> years in OSM. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What I really want is to find when I am validating is the newest >>>>>>> mapper who someone has not already given feedback. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No point in me giving a 2 hour old user feedback if you got one of >>>>>>> their tasks 5 mins ago. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That is what you can see in the Tasking Manager 3. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I know my accent bugs you, so I made a silent video of how I use the >>>>>>> TM3 to get the newest mappers feedback as fast as possible: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/BX8rzi2NqQY >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let me know what you think of the workflow in the video if you would >>>>>>> please. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Respectfully, >>>>>>> blake >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 11:06 AM, john whelan < >>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Typically when I validate I validate the most recently mapped >>> tiles >>>>>>>> first >>>>>>>> working on the principle that the faster feedback the more likely >>> it >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> be effective. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If someone has already changed their habits telling them that two >>>>>>>> villages >>>>>>>> two kilometers apart are probably not connected by a primary >>> highway >>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>> a minor road three months after they have mapped is a waste of >>> time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I can't see how to do this in TM3. I need a link to the tile. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> HOT mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> Blake Girardot >>>>>>> OSM Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot >>>>>>> HOTOSM Member - https://hotosm.org/users/blake_girardot >>>>>>> skype: jblakegirardot >>>>>>> Live OSM Mapper-Support channel - https://hotosm-slack.herokuapp >>> .com/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> HOT mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Blake Girardot >>>>> Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> HOT mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>> Blake Girardot >>> OSM Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot >>> HOTOSM Member - https://hotosm.org/users/blake_girardot >>> skype: jblakegirardot >>> Live OSM Mapper-Support channel - https://hotosm-slack.herokuapp.com/ >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing >> [email protected]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20171024/2d2b3a7f/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:16:37 -0600 > From: Richard Nairn <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [HOT] Map Size in new Task Manager > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > I like the new task manager, it gives more details about what is > happening on the map. However my issue is the size of the map itself. I > find in the old task manager the map itself was larger on the page. This > gave me a chance to zoom in to the task box at a decent size so that I > could estimate the complexity of the task. > > Would it be possible to bump up the size of the map display? By looking > at the CSS it appears there is a max width for the page, and the map > container is 50% of that. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > > ------------------------------ > > End of HOT Digest, Vol 92, Issue 15 > ***********************************
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
