There may be exceptions if the tracks are not praticable at all by vehicles (including motorbikes). They should however not even be tracks but just paths if they are just usable by horses or usable sportively by mountainbikes. Not all houses or even villages are linked by unpaved tracks=minor roads. This happens in Africa as well as Asia, but there are also some examples in Europe in mountains for some old villages that are nearly deserted, with just some agricultral buildings (mostly used as shelters for animals, but sometimes occupied to receive walking tourists in summer).
If the houses in Africa are non-permanently inhabited and are just seasonal shelters, the tracks connecting them may be in fact just paths, used sometimes by roaming animal breeders or workers in forests: the equipement is very minimalist (including for sanitisation or drinkable water, just collected in nearby rivers) and the rest of the time the tracks will not be maintained or could be vegetated. They will become visible again during short periods of activity. 2017-12-21 16:41 GMT+01:00 john whelan <[email protected]>: > It's come up in the OSMand mailing list that these aren't shown at higher > zoom levels. Whilst mapping specifically just for the rendering system is > frowned on in this case it is supported by the wiki. > > If it connects settlements then according to > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa > > it is not a track. > > unclassified or minor road surface unpaved is a reasonable default. > > Cheerio John > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
