One can find out very easily, I'd think, Mark: First, while CF Server wasn't supported on any JVM but that underlying JRun (which was 1.4x), one could certainly deploy CF 7 on another J2EE server (using the J2EE deployment option in the Enterprise or Developer edition) which then could run on whatever JVM the underlying J2EE server ran upon. I think there may have been some minor issues with some code not running, but I heard stories of people doing it successfully. That would certainly allow you to compare true apples to apples (albeit only within a given J2EE server deployment). Second, I suppose someone may well be able to downgrade their CF8 Server deployment to an older JVM, to keep all things equal within that deployment option (of course, I'm sure there are some new CF8 things that require the updated JVM),. Just throwing out thoughts. I've not tried any of this myself. /charlie
_____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Davis Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 1:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [houcfug] Re: Official CF8 Performance Numbers: 4.25 TIMES faster than 7.0.2 overall! I really wonder how much performance gain was from just changing the underlying JVM to 1.6 vs. the 1.4.2 that we were locked in with CF7 I can't believe thaty much performance gain was achieved by just tweaking the CF code Mark Davis Cricket Communications Software Engineer III 303-734-7694 (w) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list. To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
