Came across this tidbit...after being bit.  Did a name check at
netsol.com earlier this week for a site.  When someone else in the
company later tried to register it (not via netsol) the domain name
was not available.  But we were able to buy it from NetSol.  Read more
for the chutzpah they are exhibiting...and consider yourself warned.

January 10, 2008 (Computerworld) Domain-name registrar Network
Solutions Inc. may back off its controversial new policy of
automatically reserving a domain name once it has been the subject of
a search on its Web site.
The registrar came under fire <http://blog.domaintools.com/2008/01/
network-solutions-steals-domain-ideas-confirmed/> this week as it
implemented a policy that effectively locks up any domain name that is
the subject of a search on its site, preventing a customer from
registering the name with another, possibly less expensive, registrar
for four days. Network Solutions charges customers $34.99 to register
a domain name, while GoDaddy.com Inc., for example, charges up to
$9.99.
"We're making refinements to the protection measure and there are
discussions about giving people the option [of letting us hold the
domain name], but right now we're holding it for four days," said
Network Solutions spokeswoman Susan Wade.
Earlier this week, Network Solutions instituted a policy that critics
say amounts to "front running." But Wade said the new policy is
intended to prevent front running, a tactic in which scammers keep
track of domain name searches and then register those domains
themselves, hoping to sell them to the original searchers at
outlandish prices.
Wade said Network Solutions decided on the policy to register the
domain after the search so that the name won't be registered by "some
obscure person" before the original searcher comes back to register
it.
"What we're trying to do is keep that information that our customers
are putting in there from [scammers]," she said. "So we hold it for a
grace period of up to four days so you have an opportunity to consider
whether or not to register it. After four days, we release it."
Wade said before Network Solutions implemented the policy, it advised
the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which
oversees the Internet address system, of its plans.
ICANN spokesman Jason Keenan confirmed that Network Solutions notified
the organization of its new policy. Keenan said ICANN is looking into
the matter but hasn't determined whether the registrar's policy
violates its regulations.
Other registrars, meanwhile, were critical of Network Solutions'
policy.
"We think the situation speaks for itself -- it's not good for the
industry and more importantly, it's not good for the customer," a
GoDaddy spokesman said in an e-mail. "Customers should be able to
register an available domain name whenever and wherever they want."
Sigmund Solares, CEO of Intercosmos Media Group Inc., which operates
registrar directNIC.com, agreed with GoDaddy. "DirectNIC.com has never
sold customer domain name search data or WHOIS search queries,"
Solares said in an e-mail. "We use this data only for processing a
customer's request for the sole use of the customer making the
request. We have maintained a strict policy against domain name front
running in any form."
Jeffrey Eckhaus, director of Register.com, said his company
understands how important it is for people and businesses to be able
to purchase the domain names they want. "That is why we offer Domain
Hold, an option for all customers that allows them to reserve domain
names for free or a small cost depending on the length of time they'd
like to reserve it for," Eckhaus said in an e-mail.
A Register.com spokesman said the company does not automatically
reserve a domain name once it has been searched for on its site.
Larry Erlich, president of DomainRegistry.com Inc., said he was
surprised that a company like Network Solutions had instituted such a
policy. "I would have thought that was something that was happening
with smaller registrars rather than a large registrar," he said.
Erlich said Network Solutions was also preventing the transfer of
domain names to his company in violation of ICANN policy.
"We have customers who say they want to transfer a domain name from
Network Solutions to us, but when the customer tries to get an
authorization code from Network Solutions, he might have to change his
contact information -- like his e-mail address. And the minute a
customer changes his e-mail address on the Network Solutions site, it
automatically blocks that customer from changing registrars for 60
days -- a clear violation of ICANN policy," Erlich said. "We have a
case that just happened yesterday and we've written to ICANN about it;
they're not allowed to block a registrar transfer just because a
customer changes contact information."
Wade confirmed that if there is a change made to contact information,
the company institutes a 60-day hold on a transfer to ensure that the
change is not being made by someone trying to hijack a domain name.
"We are not the only ones that have instituted that policy," Wade
said. "Is it against ICANN policy? No."
The ICANN spokesman provided a link <http://www.icann.org/transfers/
policy-12jul04.htm> to the organization's policy on domain-name
transfers but did not elaborate.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston ColdFusion 
Users' Group" discussion list.
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to