1:30pm, Matt Sisk wrote: > Paul Archer wrote: >> 11:31am, Paul Archer wrote: >> >> >>> <snip> >>> >>> Only that seems inefficient. Could I normalize that somehow? >>> >> I talked this over with a coworker. He suggested one table each for users, >> client machines, and filesystems, just for lookups. Then one table for a >> combination of the three, and one table for timeperiods with the bytes >> written or read for each time period. >> > > That's not just normalized...it's first normal form. ;) > > (more or less) > Matt
Hmmm...so what would it take to get it to 3rd normal form? _______________________________________________ Houston mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/houston
