On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:01:19 -0400 Brad Oaks <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Mike Flannigan<[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Mike Flannigan wrote: > >> > >> I wonder how many people can be added > >> to a regular duplex phone system conference > >> call? AT&T conference calling is out since > >> it costs 10¢ per minute, per connection. > >> > >> I'll check on the limit on our phone system > >> at work. > >> > >> > >> Mike > > > > I was told today that our work phones conference a > > maximum of 3 people only (including the caller). If > > we need more than that, we use an AT&T > > conferencing account. > > > > Mike > > > > Unless you really need a local number, > http://www.freeconferencecall.com/ is free and fairly consistent. > > With cell phones and some home phones including free long distance > nowadays, the non-local number may not be an impediment. > > Raleigh.pm hasn't done a remote meetings (yet). The company I work > for uses this service all the time. Another member had suggested freeconferencecall.com, but I didn't pursue it too far, because of the long-distance number issue. I guess I should ask: would people be willing to use a long-distance number for the audio portion (at least for this experiment), or would a long distance call stop you from joining us? G. Wade -- The user's going to pick dancing pigs over security every time. -- Bruce Schneier _______________________________________________ Houston mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/houston Website: http://houston.pm.org/
