> If you are going to run Dancer, I'd suggest nginx. Apache is fine, but if > you're passing the request off, it's better to have a lighter weight httpd > (that also supports SSL) in front of it. For the PSGI server, I'd look at > Starman (coupled potentially with Server::Starter for initialization). > And it's really not unlike CGI::Application, just PSGI compliant and > built for persistence.
I guess since we already have apache+cgi+authnz tested and in production against our system. I was hoping to simply add a simple CGI script add get all of that for free. If I go too far out of the box, it would also require other teams to be involved. But, I totally get that PSGI is the future for Perl web applications but unfortunately we are only about 20% Perl for our "Production" facing systems. .Net and C++ being the lion's share. On the flip side, the corporate facing systems are about 70% Perl. Mike mrdvt92 _______________________________________________ Houston mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/houston Website: http://houston.pm.org/
