>For those people who came, did you like this format? Yes
>For those people who presented, would you do it again? Yes >A request was made afterward to allow the talks to run to 10 minutes >rather than being limited to 5. What do you think? I think reasonable grace should be given, while being cognizant of the number of presenters remaining. Julian On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 1:15 PM, G. Wade Johnson via Houston <[email protected] > wrote: > I'll get a full write-up on the meeting on-line this weekend, but I > thought I would give a quick summary and poll the group. > > Original lightning talk volunteers: 9 > Volunteers who bailed on us: 2 > Total lightning talks given: 9 > > 1 person gave a second lightning talk off the cuff. > 1 person volunteered to give a lightning talk with no prep. > > 7 of the 9 talks finished in less than 5 minutes. > > For those people who came, did you like this format? > For those people who presented, would you do it again? > > A request was made afterward to allow the talks to run to 10 minutes > rather than being limited to 5. What do you think? > > G. Wade > -- > Virtual is when it's not but it looks like it is and transparent is > when it is but it looks like it isn't. -- Rick Hoselton > _______________________________________________ > Houston mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/houston > Website: http://houston.pm.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Houston mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/houston Website: http://houston.pm.org/
