On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:37:42 -0600 Steven Lembark via Houston <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 23:37:39 -0600 > "G. Wade Johnson via Houston" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 20:28:06 -0600 > > Todd Rinaldo via Houston <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Slide correction: XXXIIV isn't a legal number is it? > > > > Not in either of the Roman Number systems I'm aware of. > > Why? No more than 3 X's, I's before V's. > > Then again, the last time I looked seriously at Roman Numerals > was in the fifth grade or so (i.e., long ago). Only one I allowed before the V. The correct version would be XXXIII. G. Wade -- It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. -- Richard Feynman _______________________________________________ Houston mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/houston Website: http://houston.pm.org/
