Thanx for the reply Mark. Just because it is old, does not make it correct.
In mod_perl2, I write a series of verbs that take values and do things all compiled into Apache, what is faster? I will stipulate the easy aspects of Mojo. Julian On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Mark Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > Because it's not 2004 anymore? > > Seriously, it couldn't be easier to write a nice web layer using > Mojolicious::Lite (yeah I was a Dancer guy back in the day but I'm all Mojo > these days not that I'm writing a bunch of Perl for $dayjob.) > > All you need to do is `cpanm Mojolicious` and start implementing route > handlers. It even will handle turning your hashes into JSON automagically. > > I will be out of the country for the June meeting, but it would be fun to > do a presentation about Mojo for July if people are interested in that. > > Cheers, > > Mark > > > On Thursday, June 1, 2017 11:02 AM, Julian Brown <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Per my previous mail, I will prepare for J.D.'s challenge. > > But I would like to have a discussion on the reasons one would pick dancer > or some plack layer over mod_perl2. > > We could later even do some benchmarking, but we have to get a suite of > tasks to benchmark. > > Julian > _______________________________________________ > Houston mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/houston > Website: http://houston.pm.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Houston mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/houston > Website: http://houston.pm.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Houston mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/houston Website: http://houston.pm.org/
