On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Josh Simons<Joshua.Simons at sun.com> wrote: > Peter, what is the procedure for pursuing Option B, which I believe > is our preferred direction.
A community group needs at least 3 (that's the constitutional minimum - 4 or more would be better) Core Contributors who are responsible for governing its affairs. What you need to do is identify those people who can lead the HPC Developer Community, tell the OGB who they are, and how you're going to take the community forward. > On Aug 17, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Peter Tribble wrote: > >> The HPC Developer community has less than the required minimum of >> 3 Core Contributors to govern its affairs and, according to the >> OpenSolaris >> constitution, should be terminated. The OpenSolaris Governing Board can >> deal with the situation by: >> A) Terminating the community >> B) Designating at least 3 new Core Contributors in order to >> revitalize the community, or >> C) Merge this community with another (possibly as a project). >> >> If community members step up and make a good case for options >> B or C within the next 30 days (either by guiding the OGB as to who >> the new Core Contributors should be, or by advising the OGB what >> nature of merger would be in the best interests of the affected >> community) then the OGB will work with the community to take that >> option forward. Otherwise, the OGB will ask the website community >> to terminate the community group, following the procedure set forth >> here: >> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/web/infrastructure-setup/ >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> -Peter Tribble >> OGB Vice-Chair >> _______________________________________________ >> hpcdev-discuss mailing list >> hpcdev-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/hpcdev-discuss > > -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
