On 06/03/2015 11:43 PM, [email protected] wrote: > On 2015-06-03 03:27, Klaatu wrote: > >> So, I'm voting gitlab. (We also use the self-hosted version at my work, >> seems to work well). > > Let me toss in a complete alternative to git. I know that everyone seems > to love git these days, but I became quite impressed with fossil a few > years ago. > > The big reasons I like fossil: > > - Single file repositories > - Self-contained versioning system (ie there isn't a need for external > tools like trac or redmine) > - Everything you need: scm, web-interface, ticket system and wiki all in > one > - cgi enabled for web hosting > - Runs on every platform (it's written in TCL) > - Running distributed / forks of repositories is easy > > And the whole thing is, of course, Open Source. > > If you haven't looked at it, it's worth spending some time on their > website: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki > > George > > _______________________________________________ > Hpr mailing list > [email protected] > http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org > >
Had not heard of that one. I'm going to check it out. -klaatu _______________________________________________ Hpr mailing list [email protected] http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
