Floating costs could suck a lot. Should storage and performance ever come up
again, I'd like to submit wasabi.com as a viable alternative for s3 object
storage.
1TB for $5USD/mo or $60USD/yr today's price of course.
I've been using them for a couple of months now as a backup solution for my
personal stuff and to expand the storage of my nextcloud instance.
Catch 22 is that they bill for 3 months after you 'delete' something.
--cobra2
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Saturday, September 15, 2018 6:27 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> I believe it was, but there was the same issue of cost for the solution. As
> I am donating the server, and the bandwidth it is a sort of ‘fixed’ cost for
> me. Putting the files on S3 would have made it a floating cost, and much
> harder to predict or control.
>
> --Josh
>
> From: Hpr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of cobra2 via Hpr
> Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2018 2:02 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Hpr] Old Bandwidth issues
>
> Just wondering. When the site was having bandwidth issues, was s3 ever
> brought up as a possible solution to storage/bandwidth issues?
>
> --cobra2
_______________________________________________
Hpr mailing list
[email protected]
http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
