No. i'm quite blunt in my wording. "Possibly critical" is exactly what I meant.
I'd rather not see anything changed.
We are a community. I believe in our own ability to handle this matter among
ourselves. We should handle this matter as a community rather than a policy
change. This will allow future community members the freedom to govern
themselves as needed, when we are gone. Rather than leaving some legacy policy
in place that will have to be changed in the future because.... who knows what
will happen in the future.
--cobra2
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Saturday, December 14, 2019 3:33 PM, Dave Lee <d...@thelovebug.org> wrote:
> I counter "possibly critical" with "constructive"? 😁
>
> Dave
>
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2019, 15:29 cobra2 via Hpr, <hpr@hackerpublicradio.org> wrote:
>
>> To the harassed: I hope you've ignored the person being an ass. We are here
>> to support you in pretty much any way that we can. Don't let this deter you
>> from using our platform for spreading your shows! We (most of us) love them!
>>
>> To the harasser: WTF?! Grow up please.
>>
>> I have an amended change to propose. Adding in "possibly critical" to notify
>> new hosts that opinions that differ from theirs will probably be voiced.
>> Other than that, I'm good with this.
>>
>> < Hacker Public Radio is dedicated to sharing knowledge
>> ---
>>> Hacker Public Radio is dedicated to sharing knowledge in a welcoming
>> community that offers positive, possibly critical, feedback and encourages
>> respectful debate.
>>
>> --cobra2
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hpr mailing list
>> Hpr@hackerpublicradio.org
>> http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
_______________________________________________
Hpr mailing list
Hpr@hackerpublicradio.org
http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
