I'm down with that as well. The more info, the better, that way we can improve it for HPR as a whole.
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 7:03 AM Ken Fallon <k...@fallon.ie> wrote: > Hi All, > > Most of the shows we process require us to make some level of > modifications to get them posted. This ranges from fixing tags to a > complete rewrite of the shownotes, or verifying whether intros were > actually added or not. > > Each modification that we make means that it requires more human > intervention and prevents us from being able to completely automate the > upload process. In addition there is a non trivial amount of time needed > to fix these issues. This can range from a few minutes to an hour or > more per show, and with 260 shows a year this mounts up. > > We normally don't contact hosts about these issues as it is usually > quicker to fix the issues than composing emails, and waiting for the > reply that may never come. For the most part our experience has been > that hosts are more than willing to fix these issues if they are aware > of them. > > As part of the ongoing steps toward automation, would hosts be open to > the idea of getting a processing report once we have posted the show? > This would list all the issues the test tools found and the steps that > we needed to take to rectify them. > > -- > Regards, > > Ken Fallon > http://kenfallon.com > http://hackerpublicradio.org/correspondents.php?hostid=30 > > _______________________________________________ > Hpr mailing list > Hpr@hackerpublicradio.org > http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org > -- Claudio Miranda Contributor - Hacker Public Radio http://hackerpublicradio.org
_______________________________________________ Hpr mailing list Hpr@hackerpublicradio.org http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
