On 21-04-24 20:02, BK Navarette wrote: > Funny, why does the blog writer not do show? Give an example of quality. Or > if they are shy use espeak or a volunteer to read i out, I'd be willing to > help with either. > > Brian-in-ohio >
Hello, I'm the author of the post. I regret writing this post in hindsight. 'Quality' was a bad choice of words. I also enjoy the DIY rawness of HPR and I certainly don't want it to be more polished, in some professional sense. I've should have replaced 'quality' with 'to my subjective interest' or something along those lines. The main point was to bring up the question of perhaps keeping empty slots empty. As a non-contributing listener it's not my place to try to impose my ideas on the project. Therefor I choose to post it on a personal blog rather than, for example in this mailing list. As for the reason I'm not submitting a shining example of a quality show I've been a listener since at least hpr0980 :: Broadband for Rural North and I've considered this many times and attempted it a few but I'm terrible at podcasting and after this I don't want to be known as the asshole who complained about HPR quality but still submits shows. It was not my intent to offend anyone and I regret my choice of words. I have huge respect for all of the contributors and I want to apologize to all of you. I'm sorry. All the best -- rtsn PGP: 8F72 C5BE AAFA B4BA 8F46 9185 5C39 89E0 616B B08C
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Hpr mailing list Hpr@hackerpublicradio.org http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
