> Version 3.0 seems to have a "or later" clause although I am not a lawyer > so please make up your own minds. > > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode > I found this page helpful also for a general overview of what is new in the 4.0 licenses: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> https://creativecommons.org/Version4
Here is a conversation on stackexchange about upgrading from 3.0 to 4.0 https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/7430/can-i-upgrade-the-version-of-cc-by-sa-from-3-0-to-4-0-in-my-modification The takeaway from that page: an adaptation of material licenced under 3.0 can have the newer 4.0 license as long as it contains the same elements. In HPR's case the Attribution-ShareAlike elements, but the older material can only have its license upgraded by express permission of the author. > Thoughts ? Anyone want to send in a show about this ? After a quick review, I vote to move to the newer version of the license, and I am agree to have my few contributions upgraded to the latest license. Cheers, Roan _______________________________________________ Hpr mailing list [email protected] http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
