Could it make sense to specify what it means to harm HPR? For example, in this case, that would be:
- material that threatens HPR's hosting relationships - material that exposes HPR volunteers to legal liability I think this covers the majority of issues that could come up. Is there anything else? -dnt On 6/10/22 02:29, Ken Fallon wrote: > Hi All, > > This policy change relates to shows that have been published but which > may contain problem content. > > For more information listen to today's show, where I suggest that we > continue to post the shows as normal, if we get a complaint then the > Janitors will contact the host as normal. Should the host be > unavailable, uncooperative, or disagree, then the Janitors can either > move the show to the backup queue, or hide it depending on the severity > of the complaint. In all cases we'll keep the special advisory committee > aka the auditor team of volunteers in the loop to make sure all is above > board. The community can then decide on the best course of action. > https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps.php?id=3615 > > I would like to propose the following changes to our policies. > > Both relate to > https://hackerpublicradio.org/stuff_you_need_to_know.php#not_moderated > <https://hackerpublicradio.org/stuff_you_need_to_know.php#not_moderated> > > Currently: "We do not vet, edit, moderate or in any way censor any of > the audio you submit, we trust you to do that." > > Proposed: "We do not vet, edit, moderate or in any way censor any of the > audio you submit, we trust you not to upload anything that will harm HPR." > > Add the line: "Any material that is reported as harming HPR may be > unlisted until such a time as the situation can be resolved." > > -- > Regards, > > Ken Fallon (PA7KEN,G5KEN) > https://kenfallon.com > https://hackerpublicradio.org/hosts/ken_fallon > _______________________________________________ Hpr mailing list [email protected] http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
