Yes, agree, but I have a question first:
Who is responsible for that the license is met?
I mean, if some content does not meet the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, but that
is not stated? To exemplify, an included photo that is copyright but
this is not stated. My question can apply to the current disclaimer, but
I think more relevant when also the comments are clearly included,
considering comments can be added by anyone.
I hope you understand my question and can tell if my concern can be
dismissed, explained somewhere, or needs any clarification.
Regards
Henrik Hemrin
Den 2024-10-22 kl. 09:14, skrev Ken Fallon via Hpr:
Hi All,
One goal of HPR is to have an archive of everything related to the show
available so you can download it locally for off line use.
In discussing the Mastodon integration, the license of the comments came up.
To clear up any confusion, I would like to explicitly state that
everything submitted to HPR is CC BY-SA 4.0
<https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/>.
Replacing the disclaimer on ever page from:
← Unless otherwise stated, *our shows are* released under a Creative
Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
<https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/> license.
and changing it to:
→ Unless otherwise stated, *our content is* released under a Creative
Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
<https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/> license.
This would cover comments, but also (and not limited to) shows where
people just include a link to their blogs with notes like ""See here for
shownotes".
--
Regards,
Ken Fallon (PA7KEN,G5KEN)
https://kenfallon.com
https://hackerpublicradio.org/hosts/ken_fallon
_______________________________________________
Hpr mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.hackerpublicradio.com/mailman/listinfo/hpr
_______________________________________________
Hpr mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.hackerpublicradio.com/mailman/listinfo/hpr
