I think it's perfectly reasonable for janitors to omit sections of comments that they may be concerned are not be suitable to the community news audience. The original comment is still available on the website, and interested parties can see it there.

Since the definition of what requires a "parental advisory" is relative, I'm more than happy to leave it to the discretion of the janitor reading the comment, as long as they mention that they're making an omission.

If the commenter is concerned that listeners are not getting their full message, they are more than welcome to record their comment in full and submit it as an episode.

- Windigo


On 2025-07-04 12:19, Ken Fallon via Hpr wrote:
Hi All,

For a normal show, we expect hosts to mark shows that may be sensitive in nature to include a "Parental Advisory" as described in "hpr2210 :: On Freedom of Speech and Censorship" https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr2210/index.html. See "hpr1309 :: Assisted Human Reproduction" https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr1309/index.html for an example. Nothing offensive is in the notes, or summaries but the show includes sufficient warning to give Parents, Guardians and people likely to be triggered by the topic, time to turn it off.

During the last months community news recording, I felt the words [mass maceration / mass suffocation / mass gassing] are not appropriate for reading out in the Community News, and so limited my comment to the giving the spirit of the "the fate of male chicks in the egg industry is horrific".

The commenter has objected and feels that I should have read out the comments. Therefore I am putting the decision to the community.

Does the policy allow for the Janitors to skip sections of the comments while reading the Community News ?

The policy reads: https://hackerpublicradio.org/about.html#not_moderated states "The audio of your show will not be moderated." ... We do not vet, edit, moderate or in any way censor any of the audio you submit, we trust you to do that. ...Please note that this only relates to the audio you upload. The rest of the meta-data, are managed by the HPR Community, and may be edited."

My view is that the Community News is a welcoming show, where new hosts come to get feedback on their episode, and for many who use it to decide which shows to download. The spirit of the comment was conveyed, and reading it verbatim would have required wrapping the episode in a "Parental Advisory", reducing it's download appeal, and as such the community as a whole would suffer.
_______________________________________________
Hpr mailing list
Hpr@lists.hackerpublicradio.com
https://lists.hackerpublicradio.com/mailman/listinfo/hpr

Reply via email to