Dear HPX users and developers,

The HPX users and developers at CSCS (that includes myself) have expressed an 
interest in separating the local-only and distributed functionality of HPX into 
two separate projects and repositories. This is a contentious topic, so before 
we do a large change like this we want to consult the community through a vote. 
My personal vote and motivation for the change will follow in a separate 
message.

Practically speaking, the proposal is to move the on-node functionality of HPX 
(this includes futures, algorithms, basic CUDA/HIP support, a local-only 
runtime, and all the utilities required to support this) into a separate 
repository. The remaining distributed functionality of HPX would keep the hpx 
name, stay in the current repository, and it would gain one new dependency, 
called (e.g.) hpx-local. Releases of hpx and hpx-local would often be done 
together, but could be done independently of each other.  The aim is to affect 
current users of distributed features of HPX as little as possible, while 
giving users of local-only features a project that, by default, gives them only 
local functionality. If there's consensus to go ahead with a split, we will 
also consider splitting HPX into more than two projects.

Voting works as follows (from https://hpx.stellar-group.org/governance/):
If a formal vote on a proposal is called (signaled simply by sending a email 
with [VOTE] in the subject line), all participants on the HPX user’s mailing 
list may express an opinion and vote. They do this by sending an email in reply 
to the original [VOTE] email, with the following vote and information:

- +1: ‘yes’, ‘agree’: also willing to help bring about the proposed action
- +0: ‘yes’, ‘agree’: not willing or able to help bring about the proposed 
action
- -0: ‘no’, ‘disagree’: but will not oppose the action’s going forward
- -1: ‘no’, ‘disagree’: opposes the action’s going forward and must propose an 
alternative action to address the issue (or a justification for not addressing 
the issue)
This is a "Concensus approval" vote (see governance document for details). 
Responses from developers and users alike are encouraged. Please vote as soon 
as possible, but we will leave the voting open until Thursday 17th June.


Kind regards,

Mikael Simberg
_______________________________________________
hpx-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.cct.lsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/hpx-users

Reply via email to