Just cc'ing Kevin to make sure this gets the necessary attention... Regards Hartmut --------------- http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] <hpx-users- > [email protected]> On Behalf Of Jong, K. de (Kor) > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2019 4:23 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [hpx-users] HPX 1.4.0 release candidate 2 > > On 12/6/19 5:28 PM, Simberg Mikael wrote: > > APEX integration has also > > been updated and can be enabled with -DHPX_WITH_APEX=ON and > > -DHPX_WITH_APEX_TAG=develop. The latter option will be unnecessary for > > the final release. > > I am interested in generating traces in OTF2 format to load into Vampir. > For that I am testing 1.4.0-rc2 with support for APEX and OTF2. > > Building HPX with support for APEX works fine, great! I have also built > OTF2 (version 2.2) and passed in the APEX_WITH_OTF2 flag. I noticed that > otf2_listener.cpp.o was being built. I have no reason to believe the > resulting HPX does not have support for APEX+OTF2. Also: > > ./fibonacci --hpx:info | grep APEX > HPX_WITH_APEX=ON > HPX_WITH_APEX_NO_UPDATE=OFF > > When I try this, no trace is printed, though: > > APEX_SCREEN_OUTPUT=1 ./fibonacci > > When I try this, a trace is printed: > > APEX_SCREEN_OUTPUT=1 ./apex_fibonacci > > I expected the first command to also print a trace. Is automatic > instrumentation of HPX with APEX maybe not working yet in 1.4.0-rc2? > > Kor > _______________________________________________ > hpx-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.cct.lsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/hpx-users _______________________________________________ hpx-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cct.lsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/hpx-users
