-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
OK. A good example is 1.60 This number confuses me *everytime* I look at it :) It is really the sixtieth release in the 1.x series? If it is could we use the major.minor.subversion standard. AKA instead of 1.60 we would have 1.60.0 Am I the only one with this problem? Kevin - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Location - San Francisco, CA, Cell - 415.595.9965 Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Web - http://relativity.yi.org/ Iron rusts from disuse, stagnant water loses its purity, and in cold weather becomes frozen: even so does inaction sap the vigors of the mind. -- Leonardo da Vinci -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Get my public key at: http://relativity.yi.org/pgpkey.txt iD8DBQE8G54/AwM6xb2dfE0RAtvZAKCq5spDVDLBTfoz9vlQHwYr/mGj4QCgmKlI wraY5Pa34VgcyiUKknRv8ws= =JjcL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ hsqldb-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hsqldb-developers