-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

OK.

A good example is 1.60

This number confuses me *everytime* I look at it :)

It is really the sixtieth release in the 1.x series?

If it is could we use the major.minor.subversion standard.

AKA instead of 1.60 we would have 1.60.0

Am I the only one with this problem?

Kevin

- -- 
Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
             Location - San Francisco, CA, Cell - 415.595.9965
        Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED],  Web - http://relativity.yi.org/

Iron rusts from disuse, stagnant water loses its purity, and in cold weather
becomes frozen: even so does inaction sap the vigors of the mind.
  -- Leonardo da Vinci



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Get my public key at: http://relativity.yi.org/pgpkey.txt

iD8DBQE8G54/AwM6xb2dfE0RAtvZAKCq5spDVDLBTfoz9vlQHwYr/mGj4QCgmKlI
wraY5Pa34VgcyiUKknRv8ws=
=JjcL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
hsqldb-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hsqldb-developers

Reply via email to