Yes it would be OK. Our build options are like jarmin jarXYZ ... etc and jarjdbc can be added as an option. The jar itself can be called hsqldbjdbc.jar or any suggestion ??
Fred ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Hammant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 12 March 2003 07:53 Subject: [Hsqldb-developers] Separate jar for drivers Hi folks, Without wanting to break any backwards-compatability for hsqldb.jar would it be OK to make an additional jar for the JDBC driver only? It would help reduce the byte count for WAR files (etc) that use hsqldb. Regards, - Paul ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ hsqldb-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hsqldb-developers ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ hsqldb-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hsqldb-developers
