On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Gilles Detillieux wrote:

> Interesting.  I thought Geoff had fixed this problem in the latest
> snapshot, but it seems there's still a problem here.  Geoff?

Well, it's sort of a good-news, bad-news situation. The good news is that
the rearrangement code is correct. :-) This makes me feel a bit better
since I didn't see the bug in my tests or the careful look-through.

The bad news is that I'm still having problems reproducing it and no one
else seems to be reporting the same bug. I'm still working on it though.

-Geoff


_______________________________________________
htdig-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev

Reply via email to