On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Joe R. Jah wrote: > I agree that a single patch is a lot neater, but apparently lack of those > files is not the only problem because even after I copied the files it did > not compile. No, the patch I sent uses different versions of the files--we do not want to use the current version since it relies on the rx library and not the normal regex calls. -Geoff _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
- [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3.1.6 snapshots Geoff Hutchison
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3.1.6 sna... Joe R. Jah
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3.1.6 sna... Geoff Hutchison
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3.1.6 sna... Joe R. Jah
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3.1.6 sna... Geoff Hutchison
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3.1.6 sna... Gilles Detillieux
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3.1.6... Geoff Hutchison
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3.1.6 sna... Joe R. Jah
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3.1.6 sna... Gilles Detillieux
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3.1.6 sna... Joe R. Jah
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3.1.6... Geoff Hutchison
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3.1.6... Gilles Detillieux
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3... Joe R. Jah
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch f... Gilles Detillieux
- Re: [htdig-dev] Re: URL Rewrite patch for 3.1.6... Gilles Detillieux