On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Gilles Detillieux wrote:

> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:09:07 -0600 (CST)
> From: Gilles Detillieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Joe R. Jah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Gilles Detillieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
     "ht://Dig developers list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [htdig-dev] workaround for mktime/strptime/LC_TIME problems
> 
> Like this...  Use "patch -p0 < this-message" in the htdig-3.1.6 source
> directory from the latest snapshot to use the new date parsing code.
> I'll probably post it to CVS today or tomorrow.

It's in the patch archives:

 ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.1.6/mktime-strptime-LC_TIME.0

This patch causes ssl.5 to fail.  I modified ssl.5 by removing the bit:
__________________________htdig/Document.cc_____________________________
@@ -220,6 +220,7 @@
          tm.tm_year += 1900;
        tm.tm_yday = 0; // clear these to prevent problems in strftime()
        tm.tm_wday = 0;
+       tm.tm_isdst = -1;

        if (debug > 2)
          {
________________________________________________________________________

It seems to be irrelevant after your patch.  The resulting ssl patch:

 ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.1.6/ssl.6

Regards,

Joe
-- 
     _/   _/_/_/       _/              ____________    __o
     _/   _/   _/      _/         ______________     _-\<,_
 _/  _/   _/_/_/   _/  _/                     ......(_)/ (_)
  _/_/ oe _/   _/.  _/_/ ah        [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
htdig-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev

Reply via email to