According to Geoff Hutchison: > Before I go and try to clean up the changes from the maindocs -> > htdig-3.1.6, I wanted to check on something. In the maindocs, we have the > standard SourceForge logo at the bottom--this is required by SF and is > actually a useful way of gauging # of hits to the htdig websites. > > I think I should leave this off in the htdoc/ version of the files. For > one, I think these files should be completely self-contained and not > require network access to view. For another, I think I'd be upset if I > found out the documentation in a package was "phoning home" to count > accesses. > > Thoughts? Anyone think I should include the SF logo in htdoc/ files?
I agree completely that htdoc should be self-contained. If we're going to include the SF logo, then it should be bundled-in and the HTML docs should use local, relative references for any images they include. But, if we have to change all the docs from their maindocs counterparts anyway, may as well leave off the SF logo if we don't need it. It wouldn't bother me at all if we did keep the logo, though, as long as it's bundled. -- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/~grdetil Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Phone: (204)789-3766 Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) Fax: (204)789-3930 _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
